New Page
A.1 Objective
To maintain a live pipeline of relevant and fundable opportunities aligned with THiNK's strategic priorities, ensuring that proposal development begins from a position of preparedness rather than in response to tight deadlines.
A.2 Roles and Responsibilities
|
Role |
Responsibility |
|
Team Lead (Brian) |
Sets strategic funding priorities and makes the final Go/No-Go decision on applications. |
|
Grants Maintainer (Conrad Kabuye) |
Maintains the funding opportunity tracker, manages funding alerts, conducts first-pass eligibility screening, and coordinates grant pipeline reviews. |
A.3 Step-by-Step Process
Step 1 – Define Funding Priorities (Annual Exercise)
At the beginning of each year, develop a one-page Funding Priorities Statement outlining:
-
THiNK's core research themes and strategic priorities.
-
Priority methodologies, populations, technologies, and systems of interest.
-
Geographic scope and eligibility considerations (e.g., citizenship requirements, institutional partnerships, or career-stage restrictions).
-
Three to five "anchor funders" with whom THiNK intends to build long-term relationships.
-
Ten to fifteen additional funders to monitor for strategic opportunities.
Examples of priority areas include:
-
Responsible & Trustworthy AI
-
AI Governance and Policy
-
AI for Education
-
AI for Health
-
Digital Public Infrastructure
-
Climate and AI
-
AI Safety and Ethics
-
Data
-
AI infrastructure
-
Inclusive Innovation and Emerging Technologies
Step 2 – Build and Maintain a Funding Opportunity Tracker
Maintain a continuously updated grants database containing, at minimum:
|
FIELD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suggested status categories include:
-
Identified
-
Under Review
-
Eligible
-
Go Decision Pending
-
Proposal Development
-
Submitted
-
Shortlisted
-
Awarded
-
Awaiting Agreement
-
Awaiting Disbursement
-
Implementation
-
Closed
Step 3 – Monitor Strategic Funding Channels
Funding opportunities should be monitored across multiple channels, including:
Government and Public Funders
-
National research funding agencies
-
Ministries responsible for science, innovation, and digital transformation
International and Multilateral Organizations
-
IDRC
-
UNESCO
-
World Bank
-
WHO
-
United Nations Agencies
-
Regional Development Banks
-
UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)
Foundations and Philanthropic Organizations
-
Gates Foundation
-
Wellcome Trust
-
Ford Foundation
-
Mastercard Foundation
-
Mozilla Foundation
Regional and Pan-African Funders
-
African Academy of Sciences (AESA)
-
APHRC
-
TWAS
-
Masakhane Research Foundation
-
African Union programmes
Corporate and Industry Research Programmes
-
Google Research
-
Google.org
-
Microsoft Research
-
Open-source AI initiatives
-
Technology accelerators and innovation programmes
Funding Aggregators
-
Pivot-RP
-
GrantForward
-
Research Professional
-
GrantStation
-
Candid Foundation Directory
-
Grants.gov
Professional Networks
Step 4 – Establish Passive Monitoring Systems
Funding searches should not depend solely on manual monitoring.
Establish:
-
Saved searches across funding databases.
-
Google Alerts for strategic keywords.
-
Subscriptions to funder newsletters.
-
Calendar reminders for recurring annual opportunities.
-
Automated deadline notifications where possible.
Examples of useful search terms include:
-
Responsible AI grants
-
AI Africa call for proposals
-
AI governance funding
-
Digital transformation research grants
-
Emerging technology funding opportunities
-
AI policy fellowships
Step 5 – Conduct a 15-Minute Opportunity Triage
Every opportunity should undergo an initial screening process assessing:
-
Eligibility requirements.
-
Deadline feasibility.
-
Budget suitability.
-
Strategic alignment.
-
Institutional capacity.
-
Existing funder relationships.
-
Reporting and compliance obligations.
Applications that fail mandatory eligibility requirements should be immediately removed from consideration.
Step 6 – Make the Go/No-Go Decision
Evaluate each opportunity using the following criteria:
|
Criterion |
Score |
|
Strategic Alignment |
1–5 |
|
Team Capacity |
1–5 |
|
Competitiveness |
1–5 |
|
Budget Adequacy |
1–5 |
|
Probability of Success |
1–5 |
|
Existing Relationships |
1–5 |
|
Expected Impact |
1–5 |
Borderline decisions should be discussed collectively rather than determined by a single individual.
Step 7 – Confirm Timelines and Commitments
Before committing to an application:
-
Assign proposal leads.
-
Confirm collaborator availability.
-
Establish internal deadlines.
-
Schedule required reviews and approvals.
-
Update the funding tracker accordingly.
Step 8 – Invest in Funder Relationships (Ongoing)
THiNK should actively cultivate relationships with priority funders by:
-
Attending webinars and office hours.
-
Introducing THiNK's work to programme officers.
-
Seeking feedback on unsuccessful applications.
-
Sharing publications and project outcomes when appropriate.
-
Participating in relevant research and policy communities.
Relationship-building should be viewed as a long-term investment rather than an activity that begins immediately before a funding call.
A.4 Review frequency
|
Activity |
Frequency |
|
Funding Alert Review |
Weekly |
|
Opportunity Tracker Review |
Monthly |
|
Funding Strategy Review |
Quarterly |
|
Funding Priorities Review |
Annually |