Memory Architecture
NEW IN 2026
Agent memory matured from "pick a vector database" into a benchmarked production discipline in 2026, with dedicated evaluation suites (LoCoMo (Long Conversation Memory)), MemBench, MemoryAgentBench, MemoryArena) and an ecosystem spanning roughly 20+ frameworks and vector stores across managed-cloud, self-hosted, and local-MCP hosting models.
Type |
Storage |
Layer |
Purpose |
|
Short-Term |
Session |
In-memory |
Conversation state |
|
Long-Term |
Cross-session |
Vector DB |
Semantic recall |
|
Graph Memory |
Persistent |
Graph DB |
Relationships |
|
Episodic |
Persistent |
DB |
Prior tasks / outcomes |
|
Procedural |
Persistent |
DB |
Learned workflows |
|
Policy Memory |
Persistent |
DB |
Rules & restrictions |
|
Audit Memory |
Permanent |
SQL |
Logs & traceability |
Three Patterns for Memory Control
● Pattern A — Context-resident: everything lives in the context window with compression. Simple, but caps out fast on long-running agents.
● Pattern B — Retrieval-augmented (workhorse pattern): working memory in-context, long-term records in a vector or structured store, injected each step. Recommended default, the engineering burden is manageable and the main challenge is retrieval quality.
● Pattern C — Tiered memory with learned control: multiple tiers (context, structured DB, vector store, cold archive) managed by a learned or prompted controller. Highest headroom, highest engineering cost — graduate to this only when data shows Pattern B is the bottleneck.
Best Practice
Memory entries should include:
● source
● timestamp
● confidence
● owner
● retention policy
● trust score
Known open problem across 2026 memory systems: selective forgetting. Most benchmarked systems handle retrieval and test-time learning reasonably well but still fail conspicuously at deciding what to evict. Budget explicit engineering time for eviction policy, not just ingestion.
No comments to display
No comments to display